where ˆM(z) is the matrix ie iα sin 2πz ) (4) where Λ 1 = (4π 2 k c )/(mgµ B B 0 ) and the scalar gaussian factor G(r, φ, z) is given by
|
|
- Claude Dalton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Supplementary material for Spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion and spin-polarization filtering in electron beams (corrected version 2012/10/29 Ebrahim Karimi, 1 Lorenzo Marrucci, 1, 2 Vincenzo Grillo, 3, 4 and Enrico Santamato 1 1 Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Università di Napoli Federico II, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, Napoli, Italy 2 CNR-SPIN, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, Napoli, Italy 3 CNR-Istituto Nanoscienze, Centro S3, Via G Campi 213/a, I Modena, Italy 4 CNR-IMEM, Parco delle Scienze 37a, I Parma, Italy GAUSSIAN ELECTRON BEAM IN HOMOGENEOUS WIEN FILTER Let us consider an electron beam propagating in vacuum along the z-axis, subject to transverse and orthogonal electric and magnetic fields E and B lying in the xy plane. In this Section, we assume the two fields to be spatially uniform, as in standard Wien filters, but we will release this assumption later on. If the magnetic field direction makes an angle α with the x-axis, we may write E = E 0 (sin α, cos α, 0 and B = B 0 (cos α, sin α, 0. As scalar and vector potentials, we may then take Φ = E 0 (x sin α y cos α and A = B 0 (0, 0, y cos α x sin α, respectively. In the nonrelativistic approximation and neglecting all Coulomb self-interaction effects (small charge density limit, the electron beam propagation is described by Pauli s equation [ ] 1 i t ψ = 2m ( i ea2 + eφ B ˆµ ψ (1 where ψ is the spinorial two-component wave-function of the electron beam, e = e and m are the electron charge and mass, t is the derivative with respect to the time variable t, ˆµ = 1 2 gµ B ˆσ is the electron magnetic moment, with µ B = e /2m the Bohr s magneton, g 2 the electron g-factor, and ˆσ = (ˆσ x, ˆσ y, ˆσ z the Pauli matrix vector. We seek a monochromatic paraxial-wave solution with average linear momentum p c and average kinetic energy E c = p 2 c/2m in the form ψ(x, y, z, t = exp[i(p c z E c t/ ]ũ(x, y, z, where ũ(x, y, z is taken to be a slowvarying envelope spinor field. Inserting this ansatz in Eq. (1 and neglecting small terms in the z derivatives of ũ, we obtain the paraxial Pauli equation z ũ = i ( 2 e2 2k c 2 A2 + 2m 2 B ˆµ ũ (2 where 2 = 2 x + y 2 is the Laplacian in the beam transverse plane and k c = p c / is the De Broglie wavevector along the beam axis. In deriving Eq. (2 we set E 0 = p c B 0 /m, so as to cancel out the average Lorentz force on the beam. Equation (2 determines the evolution of the spinor field ũ along the axis z. This equation can be solved analytically for the case of a gaussian input beam, as given by ũ(r, φ, 0 = ã exp[ r 2 /w 2 0] for z = 0, where w 0 is the beam waist and ã = (a 1, a 2 the input spinor, corresponding to an arbitrary spin superposition ψ = a 1 + a 2. A straightforward calculation shows that the solution is given by ũ(r, φ, z = G(r, φ, z ˆM(zã (3 where ˆM(z is the matrix ( cos 2πz Λ ˆM(z = 1 ie iα sin 2πz Λ 1 ie iα sin 2πz Λ 1 cos 2πz Λ 1 (4 where Λ 1 = (4π 2 k c /(mgµ B B 0 and the scalar gaussian factor G(r, φ, z is given by G(r, φ, z = g 0 (ze ikcr2 with ( π zr e i 2 arctan g 0 (z = (zr 2 + z2 1 4 q 2 (z = π ( z z R cos 2 (α φ + sin2 (α φ 2q 1 (z 2q 2 (z ( e i 2 arctan Λ2 πz tan πz R ( 1 π 2 zr 2 cos2 πz + 4 πz 2 sin2 (5,(6 q 1 (z = z iz R, (7 ( Λ2 sin( πz iπz R cos( πz cos( πz + iπz R sin( πz, (8 where z R = 1 2 k cw0 2 and = π kc e B 0 = gλ 1 /8 Λ 1 /4. The matrix ˆM(z given in Eq. (4 corresponds to Eq. 2 in the main paper and describes the magnetic-fieldinduced Larmor spin precession during propagation and the associated geometric phases discussed in the main paper. The precession length Λ 1 corresponds to two full spin rotations. Relativistic effects can be also taken into account, to a good approximation, by replacing everywhere the rest mass m with the relativistic mass γm, with γ = 1 + E c /(mc 2, and by considering an additional slowing down of the Larmor precession by another factor γ. In addition to the spin dynamics, from Eq. (8, we find that the wavefront complex curvature radius q 2 (z in the direction perpendicular to the magnetic field B changes periodically with spatial period. These oscillations correspond to the well known astigmatic lensing effect of the Wien filter.
2 2 SPACE-VARIANT WIEN FILTER AND RAY-TRACING SIMULATIONS In this Section, we consider q-filter field geometries with cylindrical symmetry, described by the following expression for the magnetic field (with the vector given in cartesian components: B(r, φ, z = B 0 (r(cos α(φ, sin α(φ, 0 (9 where the angle α is now the following function of the azimuthal angle: α(r, φ, z = qφ + β (10 where q is an integer and β a constant. As discussed in the main paper, such a field pattern must have a singularity of topological charge q at the beam axis r = 0. In particular, by imposing the vanishing of the field divergence, we find that the radial factor B 0 (r r q, i.e., the field vanishes on the axis for negative values of q, while it diverges for positive values of q. In the latter case, there must be a field source on the axis. The electric field will be taken to have an identical pattern, except for a local π/2 rotation, so as to balance everywhere the Lorentz force. We are particularly interested in the negative q geometries, which do not require to have a field source at the beam axis. For example, the q = 1 case corresponds to the standard quadrupole geometry, while q = 2 corresponds to an hexapole one. The electron propagation problem in such non-uniform field can only be solved approximately or numerically. A second-order geometrical optics solution is reported in Ref. [1], which includes also a detailed analysis of spin precession but without considering the geometric phase effect (as well as the magnetic dipole forces. This analysis shows that, to first order, a balanced Wien filter having quadrupole or hexapole geometry but vanishing dipole term (as in our q-filter is already stigmatic, i.e. it preserves the cylindrical symmetry without need for further corrections. The only beam lensing or distortion effects enter as higher-order aberrations (i.e., the G term in Eq. (31 of Ref. [1]. To further analyze the behavior of our q-filter, we have performed ray-tracing simulations of the electron propagation for an ideal quadrupole geometry (q = 1. These were used to assess the shape of the beam at the exit of the filter starting from an input beam having 100 kev of kinetic energy that is shaped as a ring, with a radius r of 100 µm. The magnetic field at r was set to the value of 3.5 mt, with a corresponding electric field of 575 kv/m. Our simulations are based on a numerical solution of Newton equations for the electron dynamics in the electromagnetic field, taking into account the relativistic mass increase. The electron velocity to be used as initial conditions in the simulations must be obtained from a model of the fringe fields. For the simplest description of the input fringe fields, i.e. the so-called sharp cutoff fringing field (SCOFF model, the transverse velocity components remain constant and nil, i.e. v x = v y = 0, while the z-component v z (x, y just inside the filter is given by the following expression: v z (x, y = v 0 eφ(x, y = v 0 ea z(x, y mv 0 m (11 where v 0 is the velocity outside the filter. This condition is derived from the conservation of energy and also ensures the conservation of the canonical momentum of the electrons entering the Wien filter and hence the conservation of their wavefront orientation. FIG. 1. Cross-sections of a set of simulated electron trajectories at varying propagation distances z in a q-filter having a perfect quadrupolar field pattern (q = 1. At input, the set of trajectories is taken to be uniformly distributed along a circle of radius r = 100 µm. The orientation of the four magnetic poles is indicated in the figure. (a Input plane z = 0; (b z = /4, for which the precession angle is δ = π/(4γ; (c z = /2, for which δ = π/(2γ; (d z =, for which δ = π/γ. γ is the relativistic dilation factor, which for our assumed kinetic energy of 100 kev is about 1.2. The results are reported in Fig. 1 of the present manuscript, which shows how a circle of electron positions representative of the input beam becomes deformed during the propagation into a quadrupole-lobed shape, due to second- or higher-order aberrations. For optimizing the performances of our proposed device, in particular in the spin-polarization filter application, these aberrations should be compensated by additional electron optics (e.g., octupole electrostatic lenses. Nevertheless, even for no aberration compensation, the vortex effect giving rise to the radial separation of the two spin components discussed in the spin-polarization application is
3 3 expected to be preserved, owing to its topological stability. MAGNETIC DIPOLE FORCES AND ANGULAR MOMENTUM We now evaluate the effects of the force associated with the magnetic dipole of the electrons in the magnetic field gradient of the Wien filter. This is the force used in Stern-Gerlach experiments and the only spin-dependent force acting on the electrons, so it is important to assess its effects in detail. At any given point inside the filter, assuming that the magnetic dipole of the electron is µ = gµ B S, where S is the corresponding spin vector, the associated magnetic force is F = (µ B (12 where the gradient must be taken while keeping µ constant, i.e. acting only on the magnetic field coordinates. For our classical estimate, the magnetic dipole evolution can be described by the precession equation dµ = g e 2m B µ (13 (to include also the relativistic effects here, one must replace the mass m with the relativistic mass γm and add another factor γ in the denominator on the right-handside. Assuming a starting magnetic moment parallel to the z axis, the magnetic dipole will rotate around the local magnetic field direction. In the approximation in which aberrations are neglected, each electron travels along a parallel ray with constant transverse coordinates, and hence sees a uniform magnetic field, given by Eq. (9. Therefore, the magnetic dipole at any given point inside the filter will be given by the following expression: µ(r, φ, z = µ B [ sin δ(r, z sin α(φ, sin δ(r, z cos α(φ, cos δ(r, z] (14 where δ(r, z is the total spin precession angle at z, for a trajectory at radius r. Taking the scalar product between µ and B and then the gradient with respect to the coordinates of B only, we find that the magnetic dipole force is only directed along the azimuthal direction and given by F = ˆφq µ BB 0 (r r sin δ(r, z (15 where ˆφ denotes the unit vector along the azimuthal direction and we have used Eq. (10 for taking the φ derivative. Equation (15 can be used for two purposes. First, we can verify that the ray deflection inside the Wien filter due to this force is negligible. Indeed, integrating the force in the time T needed for a full π rotation of the spin (or spin flip, we obtain the overall momentum change T π ( 1 dδ p φ = F φ (t = F φ (δ dδ 0 = 2m g e B 0 π 0 0 F φ (δdδ = 2q gr (16 We can see from this equation that the momentum variation is of the same order as the quantum uncertainty in momentum of the electron wavefunction, taking into account that the position uncertainty is of the same order of the beam size r (as it is also expected based on Bohr impossibility theorem, as discussed further below. This momentum change produces negligible effects in the electron propagation across the filter, although it instead becomes relevant in the far field. Indeed, it is precisely this force that produces the orbital angular momentum change at the basis of our spin selection. Indeed, we will now show that the torque associated with the magnetic dipole force is that responsible for the OAM change of the electrons. The z-component torque of this force is given by M z = (r F z = qµ B B 0 (r sin δ = q(µ B z = q ds z (17 where S z is the z component of the electron spin angular momentum S. Since this torque acts on the OAM of the electrons L z, we find the following angular momentum coupling law: dl z = q ds z (18 Once integrated for the entire flight time, corresponding to a full spin flip, this coupling law returns the same result reported in the main paper for the OAM variation induced by the spin flip. This correspondence proves that the effect, and the only effect, of the magnetic dipole force acting on the electrons is the change of OAM already considered by including the geometric phase shift in the wavefunction emerging from the filter. Therefore, the only significant effect of this force appears in the far field and is exactly the effect that we propose to utilize to separate electrons according to their spin. FRINGE FIELD EFFECTS The actual fringe fields depend on the electrodes and magnetic poles geometry. It is however safe to assume that the fringe fields extend only for a longitudinal distance along the z axis that is comparable to the transverse aperture of the Wien filter, and therefore much smaller than the filter length, in the large length-to-gap
4 4 ratio limit. Moreover, the transverse components of the fringe fields can be taken to have exactly the same multipolar geometry as the fields inside the Wien, and hence will give rise to similar effects both in lensing and spin precession. Their overall effect is therefore only to change the effective length of the filter. However, in addition there will also be a longitudinal z component that must be taken into account. In the lensing effect, only the z component of the electric field plays a role, by ensuring the validity of the condition (11. The z component of the magnetic fields does not affect the ray propagation, since it exerts a vanishing Lorentz force. However, the latter may affect the spin precession. If we assume that the input electrons have a spin parallel to the z axis, then the z component of the fringe magnetic field does nothing. However, the spin may be somewhat rotated away from the z axis by the transverse fringe magnetic field, and in this case the longitudinal component will induce some non-uniform precession around the z axis that may partly depolarize the beam. This effect will however be proportional to the time spent by the particles in the fringe field region, and hence will be negligible in the large length-to-gap ratio limit. We may also consider the idealized limit of an extremely thin fringe field region in which the electric and magnetic fields vary rapidly from the vanishing values they have away from the Wien filter to the values they acquire well inside the filter, which then remain perfectly constant. This is the SCOFF limit mentioned above. In particular, in the SCOFF limit the vector potential A must go from zero to the value A = [0, 0, A z (x, y] describing the multipolar magnetic field inside the filter. This rapid transition does not give rise to any magnetic field, because it is curl-free. Therefore, the SCOFF limit has vanishing magnetic fringe fields and therefore absolutely no effect on the spin, nor on the lensing behavior of the filter. On the other hand, in the SCOFF limit the electric potential must go from zero to the nonzero value Φ(x, y describing the multipolar electric field inside the filter. This in turn implies the presence of a very strong longitudinal electric fringe field that is responsible for the change of velocity given by Eq. (11. We stress that this idealized SCOFF description of the fringe fields needs not being realistic, but it is sufficient to identify the ineliminable effects that the fringe field impose to the electrons, and therefore the possible fundamental limitations that may arise from them. LAYOUT OF A SPIN-POLARIZED TEM MICROSCOPE We report in Fig. 2 the sketch of a possible TEM microscope incorporating the proposed spin-polarization filter based on the q-filter. Such a device could be used to perform spin-sensitive TEM microscopy on magnetic materials or spintronic devices. It includes the four stages FIG. 2. Sketch of a possible TEM microscope incorporating the proposed spin-polarization filter based on the q-filter. discussed in the main paper, i.e. (i the fork hologram to set the initial OAM, (ii the q-filter to couple OAM to spin, (iii an imaging stage to go in the Fourier plane, (iv an aperture to select a single spinorbit component, as well as the additional electron optics needed for imaging and collimating the beam. The input aperture of the system is defined by the fork hologram mask and has a typical radius of few microns [2]. The output iris needed to select a single spin polarization can be set to a radius of few tens of microns, by carefully selecting the aperture plane position with respect to the focal plane. It will be presumably convenient to work slightly off focus to obtain larger beam waists without the need to introduce additional magnifying optics. We note here in passing that in the new generation of TEM microscopes with aberration-corrected probe a larger number of lenses are available for beam control, and in particular a pair of hexapoles. It could be worth then exploring the possibility of using directly these lenses as an effective q-filter, without introducing additional optical elements. In this configuration, the magnetic hexapoles with opposite sign could be used to produce the polarization, while also compensating the introduced aberration. However stability issues might arise for large fields and the effect of fringing fields on the spin may also not be negligible, in this case, as the lengthto-gap ratio would not be very large. Therefore, further analysis and simulations will be necessary in order to assess this possibility.
5 5 THE ROLE OF ELECTRON DIFFRACTION In our treatment we fully included the diffraction effects only in the free propagation (through a lensing system taking place after the q-filter device. Indeed, this stage is where the correlation between OAM and radial profile develops and is then exploited for separating the different spin components. This free propagation, ending in the far-field and giving rise to the beam profiles shown in Fig. 3 of the main paper, has been evaluated using a fully quantum mechanical treatment. The diffraction effects are obviously important in the propagation from near to far field, and in particular in determining the presence or absence of destructive interference effects at the vortex position that are essential in our proposed scheme. One may wonder if we can legitimately ignore the diffraction effects in the other stages of our proposed setup. For the propagation through the q-filter, we could assess directly the role of diffraction in the case of homogeneous field, for which we have both the exact solution of Pauli s equation (including diffraction and the classical trajectory solutions. We find that diffraction is only relevant if we look at the electron beam very close to a focal point, where its wih becomes of the order of few nanometers. Away from the focus, the ensemble of classical trajectories reproduces perfectly well the quantum beam evolution. This result is not surprising, as in the q- filter all length scales are 8 9 orders of magnitude larger than the electron wavelength λ = 2π/k c, which is of few picometers for energies of the order of 100 kev (typical of electron microscopes. Therefore, we may safely assume that diffraction can be ignored also in inhomogeneous q- filter geometries, as long as no focusing occurs inside the filter. Our classical ray-tracing simulations confirm that we avoid a focusing inside the q-filter. It should be also noted that in designing and analyzing electron-optics elements as those commonly used in electron microscopy, it is quite standard to ignore quantum effects and use classical ray tracing or geometrical optics. The input and output apertures, being again about 7 orders of magnitude larger than the electron wavelength, will also give negligible diffraction effects (only some radial fringes extremely close to the aperture edges are expected, which should not affect the proper working of the proposed setup. VIOLATION OF BOHR S THEOREM As reported in Ref. [3], few years after the discovery of electron spin, several experiments were proposed (and sometimes attempted aimed at separating electrons according to their spin, mainly by exploiting inhomogeneous magnetic fields acting on the magnetic dipole associated with it (similar to the Stern-Gerlach experiment. In 1929, Niels Bohr demonstrated a sort of impossibility theorem [3], stating that no Stern-Gerlach-like experiment (including Knauer s proposal, in which an electric field was used to balance the Lorentz force could be used to separate electrons according to their spin by more than a small fraction of the beam transverse extension. This was related to the uncertainty principle and to the unavoidable orthogonal magnetic field accompanying the required magnetic field gradient. A simple explanation of this result is that the spin magnetic moment vanishes in the classical limit 0, so all attempts at separating particles according to the magnetic-moment force occurring in a magnetic field gradient give rise to a vanishing separation in the classical limit, and hence a separation that is comparable to quantum uncertainty. Actually, this statement has been later proved not to be strictly valid (see, e.g., Refs. [4, 5], although it remains extremely hard to overcome in practice. Our approach is however fundamentally different from past attempts. Indeed, we exploit the quantum nature itself of the electrons to operate the spin separation (as such, our proposal bears some similarities with a very recently proposed scheme for spin-polarization in which electron diffraction is also exploited [6]. As we have seen, the magnetic dipole force in our device acts only in the azimuthal direction, which is not the direction along which we separate the electrons. The torque associated with this force imparts the OAM variation corresponding to the azimuthal geometric phase. However, at the exit of our Wien filter the electrons show no significant spatial separation according to the spin. It is then the subsequent free propagation and diffraction that acts to separate the electrons along the radial direction, which is not the direction of the main field gradient. In particular, an efficient radial separation is ensured by the presence of a vortex at the beam axis for one spin component and not for the other. In other words, we use the quantum wavy nature of the electrons to separate them according to the spin, and hence our method is not subject to Bohr s impossibility theorem. As a further argument, even in the classical Stern-Gerlach approach Bohr s theorem does not forbid the creation of spin-polarized components at the edges of the beam, so that by suitable aperturing it should be possible to generate spinpolarized beams, although with very low efficiency. Our method is also based on selecting only an edge of the beam, although this is done in the radial direction and the efficiency is strongly improved by the vortex-related destructive interference effects. Finally, we note that in our geometry the unavoidable orthogonal magnetic field associated with the azimuthal field gradient generating the dipole forces, which is the main source of problems in the Stern-Gerlach approach to spin-polarized electron separation, is already taken into account and corresponds to the radial magnetic field of the quadrupole or hexapole configuration. So its effect has been already fully consid-
6 6 ered in our treatment. [1] M. R. Scheinfein, Optik 82, 99 (1989. [2] J. Verbeeck, H. Tian, and P. Schattschneider, Nature 467, 301 (2010. [3] O. Darrigol, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 15, 39 (1984. [4] H. Batelaan, T. J. Gay, and J. J. Schwendiman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4517 (1997. [5] G. A. Gallup, H. Batelaan, and T. J. Gay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4508 (2001. [6] S. McGregor, R. Bach, and H. Batelaan, New J. Phys. 13, (2011.
Mechanical effects of light spin and orbital angular momentum in liquid crystals
Mechanical effects of light spin and orbital angular momentum in liquid crystals E.Santamato Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche Complesso di Monte S. Angelo via
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
doi:10.1038/nature11840 Section 1. Provides an analytical derivation of the Schrödinger equation or the Helmholtz equation from the Klein-Gordon equation for electrons. Section 2 provides a mathematical
More informationGeneration of helical modes of light by spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous liquid crystals
electronic-liquid Crystal Crystal Generation of helical modes of light by spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous liquid crystals Lorenzo Marrucci Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche Università
More informationUncertainty principle
Chapter 3 Uncertainty principle Now it is Amperé s hypotheis that the source of all magnetic fields is the motion of charges. In particular, magnetic dipole moments arise from the circulation of charge.
More informationEfficient sorting of orbital angular momentum states of light
CHAPTER 6 Efficient sorting of orbital angular momentum states of light We present a method to efficiently sort orbital angular momentum (OAM) states of light using two static optical elements. The optical
More informationLight-induced spiral mass transport in azo-polymer films under vortex-beam illumination Supplementary Information
Light-induced spiral mass transport in azo-polymer films under vorte-beam illumination Supplementary Information Antonio Ambrosio a),1, Lorenzo Marrucci 1, Fabio Borbone, Antonio Roviello and Pasqualino
More informationBirth and evolution of an optical vortex
Vol. 24, No. 5 / 25 Jul 26 / OPTICS EXPRESS 639 Birth and evolution of an optical vortex GIUSEPPE VALLONE,, ANNA SPONSELLI, 2 VINCENZO D AMBROSIO, 3,5 LORENZO MARRUCCI, 4 FABIO SCIARRINO 3 AND PAOLO VILLORESI
More informationLaser Optics-II. ME 677: Laser Material Processing Instructor: Ramesh Singh 1
Laser Optics-II 1 Outline Absorption Modes Irradiance Reflectivity/Absorption Absorption coefficient will vary with the same effects as the reflectivity For opaque materials: reflectivity = 1 - absorptivity
More informationarxiv:physics/ v2 [physics.gen-ph] 5 Feb 2002
Are the electron spin and magnetic moment parallel or antiparallel vectors? arxiv:physics/11257v2 [physics.gen-ph] 5 Feb 22 Martín Rivas Dpto. de Física Teórica, The University of the Basque Country, Apdo.
More informationHigh-Resolution. Transmission. Electron Microscopy
Part 4 High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy 186 Significance high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM): resolve object details smaller than 1nm (10 9 m) image the interior of
More informationarxiv: v2 [physics.optics] 10 Feb 2017
Birth and evolution of an optical vortex arxiv:64.8v2 [physics.optics] Feb 27 Giuseppe Vallone,, Anna Sponselli, 2 Vincenzo D Ambrosio, 3,5 Lorenzo Marrucci, 4 Fabio Sciarrino 3 and Paolo Villoresi Dipartimento
More informationRepresentation of the quantum and classical states of light carrying orbital angular momentum
Representation of the quantum and classical states of light carrying orbital angular momentum Humairah Bassa and Thomas Konrad Quantum Research Group, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa
More informationProbing the orbital angular momentum of light with a multipoint interferometer
CHAPTER 2 Probing the orbital angular momentum of light with a multipoint interferometer We present an efficient method for probing the orbital angular momentum of optical vortices of arbitrary sizes.
More informationAngular momentum and spin
Luleå tekniska universitet Avdelningen för Fysik, 007 Hans Weber Angular momentum and spin Angular momentum is a measure of how much rotation there is in particle or in a rigid body. In quantum mechanics
More informationPhysical Principles of Electron Microscopy. 2. Electron Optics
Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy 2. Electron Optics Ray Egerton University of Alberta and National Institute of Nanotechnology Edmonton, Canada www.tem-eels.ca regerton@ualberta.ca Properties
More informationAtomic Structure. Chapter 8
Atomic Structure Chapter 8 Overview To understand atomic structure requires understanding a special aspect of the electron - spin and its related magnetism - and properties of a collection of identical
More informationFLUX OF VECTOR FIELD INTRODUCTION
Chapter 3 GAUSS LAW ntroduction Flux of vector field Solid angle Gauss s Law Symmetry Spherical symmetry Cylindrical symmetry Plane symmetry Superposition of symmetric geometries Motion of point charges
More informationcharges q r p = q 2mc 2mc L (1.4) ptles µ e = g e
APAS 5110. Atomic and Molecular Processes. Fall 2013. 1. Magnetic Moment Classically, the magnetic moment µ of a system of charges q at positions r moving with velocities v is µ = 1 qr v. (1.1) 2c charges
More informationS2E: Solenoidal Focusing
S2E: Solenoidal Focusing Writing out explicitly the terms of this expansion: The field of an ideal magnetic solenoid is invariant under transverse rotations about it's axis of symmetry (z) can be expanded
More informationS2E: Solenoidal Focusing
S2E: Solenoidal Focusing The field of an ideal magnetic solenoid is invariant under transverse rotations about it's axis of symmetry (z) can be expanded in terms of the on axis field as as: solenoid.png
More informationAPPENDIX E SPIN AND POLARIZATION
APPENDIX E SPIN AND POLARIZATION Nothing shocks me. I m a scientist. Indiana Jones You ve never seen nothing like it, no never in your life. F. Mercury Spin is a fundamental intrinsic property of elementary
More informationPrinciples of Electron Optics
Principles of Electron Optics Volume 1 Basic Geometrical Optics by P. W. HAWKES CNRS Laboratory of Electron Optics, Toulouse, France and E. KASPER Institut für Angewandte Physik Universität Tübingen, Federal
More information3.5 Cavities Cavity modes and ABCD-matrix analysis 206 CHAPTER 3. ULTRASHORT SOURCES I - FUNDAMENTALS
206 CHAPTER 3. ULTRASHORT SOURCES I - FUNDAMENTALS which is a special case of Eq. (3.30. Note that this treatment of dispersion is equivalent to solving the differential equation (1.94 for an incremental
More informationMolecules in Magnetic Fields
Molecules in Magnetic Fields Trygve Helgaker Hylleraas Centre, Department of Chemistry, University of Oslo, Norway and Centre for Advanced Study at the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Oslo, Norway
More informationHolography and Optical Vortices
WJP, PHY381 (2011) Wabash Journal of Physics v3.3, p.1 Holography and Optical Vortices Z. J. Rohrbach, J. M. Soller, and M. J. Madsen Department of Physics, Wabash College, Crawfordsville, IN 47933 (Dated:
More informationPhysics 3312 Lecture 7 February 6, 2019
Physics 3312 Lecture 7 February 6, 2019 LAST TIME: Reviewed thick lenses and lens systems, examples, chromatic aberration and its reduction, aberration function, spherical aberration How do we reduce spherical
More informationTHEORETICAL COMPETITION. 1A. SPRING CYLINDER WITH MASSIVE PISTON (5 points)
Question 1 1A. SPRING CYLINDER WITH MASSIVE PISTON (5 points) Consider n=2 moles of ideal Helium gas at a pressure P 0, volume V 0 and temperature T 0 = 300 K placed in a vertical cylindrical container
More informationMidterm Solutions. 1 1 = 0.999c (0.2)
Midterm Solutions 1. (0) The detected muon is seen km away from the beam dump. It carries a kinetic energy of 4 GeV. Here we neglect the energy loss and angular scattering of the muon for simplicity. a.
More information1. Consider the biconvex thick lens shown in the figure below, made from transparent material with index n and thickness L.
Optical Science and Engineering 2013 Advanced Optics Exam Answer all questions. Begin each question on a new blank page. Put your banner ID at the top of each page. Please staple all pages for each individual
More informationBeamline Design for a Stern-Gerlach Deflection Experiment in CEBAF 1D Spectrometer Line
Beamline Design for a Stern-Gerlach Deflection Experiment in CEBAF 1D Spectrometer Line Richard Talman, Laboratory of Elementary-Particle Physics, Cornell University 12 December, 2016 1 Beamline Optics
More informationS1: Particle Equations of Motion S1A: Introduction: The Lorentz Force Equation
S1: Particle Equations of Motion S1A: Introduction: The Lorentz Force Equation The Lorentz force equation of a charged particle is given by (MKS Units):... particle mass, charge... particle coordinate...
More informationElectromagnetic waves in free space
Waveguide notes 018 Electromagnetic waves in free space We start with Maxwell s equations for an LIH medum in the case that the source terms are both zero. = =0 =0 = = Take the curl of Faraday s law, then
More informationElectromagnetic Field Theory (EMT)
Electromagnetic Field Theory (EMT) Lecture # 9 1) Coulomb s Law and Field Intensity 2) Electric Fields Due to Continuous Charge Distributions Line Charge Surface Charge Volume Charge Coulomb's Law Coulomb's
More informationTransient effects on electron spin observation
Transient effects on electron spin observation Article (Published Version) Larson, J, Garraway, B M and Stenholm, S (004) Transient effects on electron spin observation. Physical Review A, 69. 03103. ISSN
More informationBMT Equation Analysis and Spin in Accelerator Physics
Final project for Physics 342 - Quantum Mechanics II BMT Equation Analysis and Spin in Accelerator Physics T. Zolkin The University of Chicago, Department of Physics Abstract. As known from the non relativistic
More informationThe curious properties of spin
The curious properties of spin February, 07 The Stern-Gerlach experiment The Schrödinger equation predicts degenerate energy levels for atoms electron states that differ only in the z-component of their
More information4/21/2010. Schrödinger Equation For Hydrogen Atom. Spherical Coordinates CHAPTER 8
CHAPTER 8 Hydrogen Atom 8.1 Spherical Coordinates 8.2 Schrödinger's Equation in Spherical Coordinate 8.3 Separation of Variables 8.4 Three Quantum Numbers 8.5 Hydrogen Atom Wave Function 8.6 Electron Spin
More informationSlow Photons in Vacuum as Elementary Particles. Chander Mohan Singal
Ref ETOP98 Slow Photons in Vacuum as Elementary Particles Chander Mohan Singal Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology-Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi-1116, INDIA E-Mail: drcmsingal@yahoocom
More informationMatter Waves. Chapter 5
Matter Waves Chapter 5 De Broglie pilot waves Electromagnetic waves are associated with quanta - particles called photons. Turning this fact on its head, Louis de Broglie guessed : Matter particles have
More informationSingle particle motion
Single particle motion Plasma is a collection of a very large number of charged particles moving in, and giving rise to, electromagnetic fields. Before going to the statistical descriptions, let us learn
More informationThe Angular Momentum Controversy: Resolution of a Conflict Between Laser and Particle Physics. Elliot Leader. Imperial College London
The Angular Momentum Controversy: Resolution of a Conflict Between Laser and Particle Physics Elliot Leader Imperial College London 1 WHAT S IT ALL ABOUT? THE CONCEPTS INVOLVED THE PARTICLE PHYSICS CONTRO-
More informationChapter 11. Radiation. How accelerating charges and changing currents produce electromagnetic waves, how they radiate.
Chapter 11. Radiation How accelerating charges and changing currents produce electromagnetic waves, how they radiate. 11.1.1 What is Radiation? Assume a radiation source is localized near the origin. Total
More informationECE440 Nanoelectronics. Lecture 07 Atomic Orbitals
ECE44 Nanoelectronics Lecture 7 Atomic Orbitals Atoms and atomic orbitals It is instructive to compare the simple model of a spherically symmetrical potential for r R V ( r) for r R and the simplest hydrogen
More informationbeam (as different VSP One element from 400 to 1500nm diffraction, No segments
APPLICATION NOTE The Arcoptix Variable Spiral plate () The variable Spiral plate (), also called Q plate in literature, is a passive liquid crystal optical element that is capable to modify the spatial
More informationWelcome back to PHYS 3305
Welcome back to PHYS 3305 Otto Stern 1888-1969 Walther Gerlach 1889-1979 Today s Lecture: Angular Momentum Quantization Stern-Gerlach Experiment Review: Orbital Dipole Moments The magnetic moment for an
More informationLecture notes 5: Diffraction
Lecture notes 5: Diffraction Let us now consider how light reacts to being confined to a given aperture. The resolution of an aperture is restricted due to the wave nature of light: as light passes through
More informationThe Hydrogen Atom. Dr. Sabry El-Taher 1. e 4. U U r
The Hydrogen Atom Atom is a 3D object, and the electron motion is three-dimensional. We ll start with the simplest case - The hydrogen atom. An electron and a proton (nucleus) are bound by the central-symmetric
More informationGeneration and dynamics of optical beams with polarization singularities
Generation and dynamics of optical beams with polarization singularities Filippo Cardano, 1 Ebrahim Karimi, 1, Lorenzo Marrucci, 1, Corrado de Lisio, 1, and Enrico Santamato 1,3 1 Dipartimento di Fisica,
More informationAtomic and nuclear physics
Atomic and nuclear physics Atomic shell Normal Zeeman effect LEYBOLD Physics Leaflets Observing the normal Zeeman effect in transverse and longitudinal configuration Spectroscopy with a Fabry-Perot etalon
More informationLoop corrections in Yukawa theory based on S-51
Loop corrections in Yukawa theory based on S-51 Similarly, the exact Dirac propagator can be written as: Let s consider the theory of a pseudoscalar field and a Dirac field: the only couplings allowed
More informationQuantum Mechanics without Complex Numbers: A Simple Model for the Electron Wavefunction Including Spin. Alan M. Kadin* Princeton Junction, NJ
Quantum Mechanics without Complex Numbers: A Simple Model for the Electron Wavefunction Including Spin Alan M. Kadin* Princeton Junction, NJ February 22, 2005 Abstract: A simple real-space model for the
More informationOffset Spheroidal Mirrors for Gaussian Beam Optics in ZEMAX
Offset Spheroidal Mirrors for Gaussian Beam Optics in ZEMAX Antony A. Stark and Urs Graf Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, University of Cologne aas@cfa.harvard.edu 1 October 2013 This memorandum
More informationIntroduction to electron and photon beam physics. Zhirong Huang SLAC and Stanford University
Introduction to electron and photon beam physics Zhirong Huang SLAC and Stanford University August 03, 2015 Lecture Plan Electron beams (1.5 hrs) Photon or radiation beams (1 hr) References: 1. J. D. Jackson,
More information04.sup Equations of Motion and Applied Fields *
04.sup Equations of Motion and Applied Fields * Prof. Steven M. Lund Physics and Astronomy Department Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) Michigan State University (MSU) S2: Transverse Particle Equations
More informationThe 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation
Chapter 6 The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation 6.1 Angular Momentum To study how angular momentum is represented in quantum mechanics we start by reviewing the classical vector of orbital angular momentum
More informationModern Physics for Scientists and Engineers International Edition, 4th Edition
Modern Physics for Scientists and Engineers International Edition, 4th Edition http://optics.hanyang.ac.kr/~shsong Review: 1. THE BIRTH OF MODERN PHYSICS 2. SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY 3. THE EXPERIMENTAL
More informationRelativistic corrections of energy terms
Lectures 2-3 Hydrogen atom. Relativistic corrections of energy terms: relativistic mass correction, Darwin term, and spin-orbit term. Fine structure. Lamb shift. Hyperfine structure. Energy levels of the
More informationBessel & Laguerre-Gauss Beam Generation using SLM as a Reconfigurable Diffractive Optical Element
Bessel & Laguerre-Gauss Beam Generation using SLM as a Reconfigurable Diffractive Optical Element Sendhil Raja S., Rijuparna Chakraborty*, L.N.Hazra*, A.G.Bhujle Laser Instrumentation Section, Instrumentation
More informationNonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators
Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators Part 2: Basic tools and concepts Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators This course consists of eight lectures: 1.
More informationIntroduction to Quantum Mechanics (Prelude to Nuclear Shell Model) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle In the microscopic world,
Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (Prelude to Nuclear Shell Model) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle In the microscopic world, x p h π If you try to specify/measure the exact position of a particle you
More informationPhysics 221B Spring 2018 Notes 34 The Photoelectric Effect
Copyright c 2018 by Robert G. Littlejohn Physics 221B Spring 2018 Notes 34 The Photoelectric Effect 1. Introduction In these notes we consider the ejection of an atomic electron by an incident photon,
More informationfree space (vacuum) permittivity [ F/m]
Electrostatic Fields Electrostatic fields are static (time-invariant) electric fields produced by static (stationary) charge distributions. The mathematical definition of the electrostatic field is derived
More informationComputations on Gabor lens having two different field distributions
IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP) e-issn: 2278-4861.Volume 6, Issue 6 Ver. II (Nov.-Dec. 2014), PP 06-11 Computations on Gabor lens having two different field distributions Saif KamilShnain Department
More informationChapter 3 Time dilation from the classical wave equation. from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory.
Chapter 3 Time dilation from the classical wave equation from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory Hans de Vries July 28, 2009 2 Chapter Contents 3 Time dilation from the classical
More informationPlane electromagnetic waves and Gaussian beams (Lecture 17)
Plane electromagnetic waves and Gaussian beams (Lecture 17) February 2, 2016 305/441 Lecture outline In this lecture we will study electromagnetic field propagating in space free of charges and currents.
More informationChapter 6. Quantum Theory of the Hydrogen Atom
Chapter 6 Quantum Theory of the Hydrogen Atom 1 6.1 Schrodinger s Equation for the Hydrogen Atom Symmetry suggests spherical polar coordinates Fig. 6.1 (a) Spherical polar coordinates. (b) A line of constant
More informationP3317 HW from Lecture 15 and Recitation 8
P3317 HW from Lecture 15 and Recitation 8 Due Oct 23, 218 Problem 1. Variational Energy of Helium Here we will estimate the ground state energy of Helium. Helium has two electrons circling around a nucleus
More information(a) Write down the total Hamiltonian of this system, including the spin degree of freedom of the electron, but neglecting spin-orbit interactions.
1. Quantum Mechanics (Spring 2007) Consider a hydrogen atom in a weak uniform magnetic field B = Bê z. (a) Write down the total Hamiltonian of this system, including the spin degree of freedom of the electron,
More informationSingle Particle Motion
Single Particle Motion C ontents Uniform E and B E = - guiding centers Definition of guiding center E gravitation Non Uniform B 'grad B' drift, B B Curvature drift Grad -B drift, B B invariance of µ. Magnetic
More informationSupplementary Materials for
wwwsciencemagorg/cgi/content/full/scienceaaa3035/dc1 Supplementary Materials for Spatially structured photons that travel in free space slower than the speed of light Daniel Giovannini, Jacquiline Romero,
More informationThree Loose Ends: Edge Focusing; Chromaticity; Beam Rigidity.
Linear Dynamics, Lecture 5 Three Loose Ends: Edge Focusing; Chromaticity; Beam Rigidity. Andy Wolski University of Liverpool, and the Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury, UK. November, 2012 What we Learned
More informationWe also find the development of famous Schrodinger equation to describe the quantization of energy levels of atoms.
Lecture 4 TITLE: Quantization of radiation and matter: Wave-Particle duality Objectives In this lecture, we will discuss the development of quantization of matter and light. We will understand the need
More informationPhysics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 13 Spins in Magnetic Fields
Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 13 Spins in Magnetic Fields A nice illustration of rotation operator methods which is also important physically is the problem of spins in magnetic fields. The earliest experiments
More informationChapter 6 Electronic structure of atoms
Chapter 6 Electronic structure of atoms light photons spectra Heisenberg s uncertainty principle atomic orbitals electron configurations the periodic table 6.1 The wave nature of light Visible light is
More informationCreating and probing of a perfect vortex in situ with an optically trapped particle
Creating and probing of a perfect vortex in situ with an optically trapped particle Mingzhou Chen, Michael Mazilu, Yoshihiko Arita, Ewan M. Wright, and Kishan Dholakia, SUPA, School of Physics & Astronomy,
More informationVector diffraction theory of refraction of light by a spherical surface
S. Guha and G. D. Gillen Vol. 4, No. 1/January 007/J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1 Vector diffraction theory of refraction of light by a spherical surface Shekhar Guha and Glen D. Gillen* Materials and Manufacturing
More informationRadius of single fluxon electron model identical with classical electron radius
Radius of single fluxon electron model identical with classical electron radius U. Kayser-Herold 12 February 2017 Abstract Analytical determination of the magnetic flux included in the electron s dipole
More information20 The Hydrogen Atom. Ze2 r R (20.1) H( r, R) = h2 2m 2 r h2 2M 2 R
20 The Hydrogen Atom 1. We want to solve the time independent Schrödinger Equation for the hydrogen atom. 2. There are two particles in the system, an electron and a nucleus, and so we can write the Hamiltonian
More informationGreen s function for the wave equation
Green s function for the wave equation Non-relativistic case January 2018 1 The wave equations In the Lorentz Gauge, the wave equations for the potentials are (Notes 1 eqns 44 and 43): 1 2 2 2 2 0 (1)
More informationJackson 6.4 Homework Problem Solution Dr. Christopher S. Baird University of Massachusetts Lowell
Jackson 6.4 Homework Problem Solution Dr. Christopher S. Baird University of Massachusetts Lowell PROBLEM: A uniformly magnetized and conducting sphere of radius R and total magnetic moment m = 4πMR 3
More informationSupplementary Figure 1. Illustration of the angular momentum selection rules for stimulated
0 = 0 1 = 0 0 = 0 1 = 1 0 = -1 1 = 1 0 = 1 1 = 1 k φ k φ k φ k φ a p = 0 b p = -1 c p = - d p = 0 Supplementary Figure 1. Illustration of the angular momentum selection rules for stimulated Raman backscattering
More informationParticle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof. Mark Thomson. Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation. Non-Relativistic QM (Revision)
Particle Physics Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof. Mark Thomson + e - e + - + e - e + - + e - e + - + e - e + - Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation Prof. M.A. Thomson Michaelmas 2011 45 Non-Relativistic QM (Revision)
More informationarxiv: v2 [physics.acc-ph] 27 Oct 2014
Maxwell s equations for magnets A. Wolski University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK and the Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury, UK arxiv:1103.0713v2 [physics.acc-ph] 27 Oct 2014 Abstract Magnetostatic fields
More informationElectric and Magnetic Forces in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Formalism
Electric and Magnetic Forces in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Formalism Benjamin Hornberger 1/26/1 Phy 55, Classical Electrodynamics, Prof. Goldhaber Lecture notes from Oct. 26, 21 Lecture held by Prof. Weisberger
More informationCHARGED PARTICLE MOTION IN CONSTANT AND UNIFORM ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS
CHARGED PARTICLE MOTION IN CONSTANT AND UNIFORM ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS In this and in the following two chapters we investigate the motion of charged particles in the presence of electric and magnetic
More informationMaxwell s equations. electric field charge density. current density
Maxwell s equations based on S-54 Our next task is to find a quantum field theory description of spin-1 particles, e.g. photons. Classical electrodynamics is governed by Maxwell s equations: electric field
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v2 25 Aug 2004
Vacuum fluctuations and Brownian motion of a charged test particle near a reflecting boundary arxiv:quant-ph/4622v2 25 Aug 24 Hongwei Yu CCAST(World Lab.), P. O. Box 873, Beijing, 8, P. R. China and Department
More informationLecture3 (and part of lecture 4).
Lecture3 (and part of lecture 4). Angular momentum and spin. Stern-Gerlach experiment Spin Hamiltonian Evolution of spin with time Evolution of spin in precessing magnetic field. In classical mechanics
More informationMaxwell's Equations and Conservation Laws
Maxwell's Equations and Conservation Laws 1 Reading: Jackson 6.1 through 6.4, 6.7 Ampère's Law, since identically. Although for magnetostatics, generally Maxwell suggested: Use Gauss's Law to rewrite continuity
More informationFurther Considerations Regarding the Aharonov-Bohm Effect and the Wavefunction of the Entire System
Further Considerations Regarding the Aharonov-Bohm Effect and the Wavefunction of the Entire System Allan Walstad Department of Physics, University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown, PA 15904 USA email: awalstad@pitt.edu
More informationThe Hydrogen Atom. Thornton and Rex, Ch. 7
The Hydrogen Atom Thornton and Rex, Ch. 7 Applying Schrodinger s Eqn to the Hydrogen Atom The potential: -1 e 2 V(r) = 4p e0 r Use spherical polar coordinates (with y(x,y,z) => y(r,q,f) ): 1 y 1 y ( r
More informationMeasurements in Optics for Civil Engineers
Measurements in Optics for Civil Engineers I. FOCAL LENGTH OF LENSES The behavior of simplest optical devices can be described by the method of geometrical optics. For convex or converging and concave
More informationLecture 15 Notes: 07 / 26. The photoelectric effect and the particle nature of light
Lecture 15 Notes: 07 / 26 The photoelectric effect and the particle nature of light When diffraction of light was discovered, it was assumed that light was purely a wave phenomenon, since waves, but not
More informationNew Bohr model calculates Helium ground state energy correctly
New Bohr model calculates Helium ground state energy correctly Y. Tsubono 303 5-16 Daita6-chome, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 155-0033, JAPAN E-mail: tubono@mug.biglobe.ne.jp Abstract: The quantum mechanical methods
More informationThe Zeeman Effect refers to the splitting of spectral
Calculation of the Bohr Magneton Using the Zeeman Effect Robert Welch Abstract The Zeeman Effect was predicted by Hendrik Lorentz and first observed by Pieter Zeeman in 1896. It refers to the splitting
More informationB r Solved Problems Magnetic Field of a Straight Wire
(4) Equate Iencwith d s to obtain I π r = NI NI = = ni = l π r 9. Solved Problems 9.. Magnetic Field of a Straight Wire Consider a straight wire of length L carrying a current I along the +x-direction,
More informationSMR WINTER COLLEGE QUANTUM AND CLASSICAL ASPECTS INFORMATION OPTICS. The Origins of Light s angular Momentum
SMR.1738-8 WINTER COLLEGE on QUANTUM AND CLASSICAL ASPECTS of INFORMATION OPTICS 30 January - 10 February 2006 The Origins of Light s angular Momentum Miles PADGETT University of Glasgow Dept. of Physics
More informationChapter 4. Electrostatic Fields in Matter
Chapter 4. Electrostatic Fields in Matter 4.1. Polarization 4.2. The Field of a Polarized Object 4.3. The Electric Displacement 4.4. Linear Dielectrics 4.5. Energy in dielectric systems 4.6. Forces on
More informationarxiv: v1 [math-ph] 3 Nov 2011
Formalism of operators for Laguerre-Gauss modes A. L. F. da Silva (α), A. T. B. Celeste (β), M. Pazetti (γ), C. E. F. Lopes (δ) (α,β) Instituto Federal do Sertão Pernambucano, Petrolina - PE, Brazil (γ)
More informationEvaluating the Emittance Increase Due to the RF Coupler Fields
Evaluating the Emittance Increase Due to the RF Coupler Fields David H. Dowell May 2014 Revised June 2014 Final Revision November 11, 2014 Abstract This technical note proposes a method for evaluating
More information